Having a family member handle your accounting work is not always moral. This might be dangerous for many reasons, including the possibility of them becoming suspicious of your motives, discovering that you have a conflict of interest, or misusing sensitive information. After all, is said and done, you should educate yourself on the moral implications of having a close relative handle your tax preparation.
An integral aspect of any sound ethics policy is the management of potential conflicts of interest. The policy specifies the steps to take when evaluating a transaction for potential conflicts of interest and the outcomes that can be expected if a conflict is found to exist. Interest conflicts can be divided into two broad categories. To start, there's a personal financial stake. This kind of curiosity is separate from the interest of the broader population. Any financial stake a lawmaker may have in a deal with the government must be declared. Additionally, there is a robust financial connection between the two parties. That's because the lawmaker is receiving a substantial profit from another corporation. Legislators can be influenced this way even if they have no financial ties to the other group. Different states and regions have different standards for a conflict of interest. In business, a conflict of interest can arise when a close relative works for an adversary. Romantic relationships are another source of friction. An employee has a conflict of interest if they are romantically involved with management. If you are an accountant or are considering becoming one, keep a few things in mind. Being ethical requires you to abide by the rules set out by your industry. Acquiring knowledge about ethical concerns is also useful. Recent revisions have added new inducement provisions to the IESBA Code of Ethics. These revisions will make the Code easier to understand and follow. As of January 1, 2020, the Code has been updated to include a new "intent test" that makes it illegal to provide or receive inducements to influence the recipient's behavior inappropriately. Professional accountants can use the intent test as a roadmap for making sound decisions. The IESBA defines an incentive as any behavior likely to influence another's improper behavior. Keep in mind that this does not automatically label your actions as illegal. Incentives come in the form of anything from gifts to hospitality. If you have reason to believe that your employer is acting improperly, you should disclose your suspicions. Whistleblowing describes this type of action. You can make a formal complaint to your supervisor or the appropriate authority or blow the whistle in an informal setting. If you fail to report the inappropriate behavior, you may face retaliation or even termination from your position. Financial accountants are a company's best line of defense against misconduct. A study was conducted amongst a representative sample of accountants in the field to learn more about their attitudes on internal and external whistleblowing. Given these findings, accountants are more inclined to report wrongdoing inside their organization than to report it to outside authorities. In any case, there is no proof that the likelihood of experiencing retribution is linked to the likelihood of blowing the whistle. To ensure the accuracy of the measurement, a partial least square structural equation model was developed. The model found that the likelihood of reporting wrongdoing was unaffected by the total amount of retaliation but was diminished by the severity of reprisal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
|